Not effective advertising

Something on my mind these days is advertising. I’m keen to get the word about this blog spread about as much as possible, you see – it would be selfish not to – and I have been keeping my eyes peeled for examples of advertising.

Here is a tasty morsel of advertising that I want to talk about. It’s a billboard advertising a product called “Tango”, which is some kind of fizzy, sugary, orangey beverage which I have consumed on two occasions.

Too much Tango made me suck a bull's udder

The advertisement tells the tragic story of a person who drank too much Tango, and was then compelled to suck the udder of a bull.

Naturally, the makers of Tango want us to drink as much Tango as possible. So why are they warning us that there might be these dangerous side-effects?

If such side-effects exist, then it’s obviously a legal requirement to stuck some small lettering at the bottom. But the thing is, there is no evidence whatsoever, as far as I am aware, to suggest that consuming too much Tango can do anything other than destroy your teeth. They are presumably trying to sound dangerous and edgy, like drugs or something, but instead it’s off-putting.

Although I live in the countryside, there are not many bulls nearby. In order to suck a bull’s udder, I would have to run for miles, squandering time that could be otherwise used much more effectively – I could be busy not writing a blog post, for instance.

And bulls don’t even have udders. I’m sure there’s some kind of law against that – suggesting that bulls have udders, when in fact they don’t. It’s misleading. A bull would no doubt grow extremely horny and furious if one started looking for an udder about its person on which to suck.

I am never going to drink Tango again. Sucking a bull’s udder sounds nightmarish.

Unless maybe this is a cunning plot from the makers of a rival fizzy drink, such as Dr Pepper (who, I believe is not an actual qualified doctor – a bit like Gillian McKeith). In that case, it’s very clever indeed. There will, I assume, be a follow-up – “Too much Dr Pepper made my goldfish immortal”, or something else equally enticing.

I’m thinking of a similar plot. “Reading TechCrunch turns your eyeballs into corks.”

2 comments

  1. Phil Stockdales

    I agree. It’s garbage.

    It’s poor on so many levels. Not least of all the typography that could have been done by my nan. Even if the intention was to look s**t, there should at least be a good Idea underneath to forgive it for.

    Bull’s obviously don’t have udders so what are we saying here? That the poor consumer was so confused that he gave a bull a BJ? Just because something is whacky/offensive doesn’t make it good. I could take a picture of one of my turds and stick a can of Tango in it and ad a surreal headline and everybody would be talking about it but for the wrong reasons.

    P

  2. Josh

    I do hate to be a buzzkill, but I was hoping for a whole month of nobody leaving a comment on this blog. That would have been amusingly tragic. Oh well, it’s definitely more of a silver cloud with a tiny dot of murk in the middle than a real bad thing.

    I actually thought the typography and overall design was the best thing about it. Maybe I just don’t have very good taste. Mind you, the B is far too big – the designer must be making up for a lack of size somewhere else, if he’s got to resort to such humongous lettering. That tiny, shoehorned-in apostrophe is perhaps symbolic.

    Whatever. I’m giving them the oxygen of publicity here – better stop. Maybe that is effective advertising.